Evaluation of a protocol for reducing the microbial contamination of dental unit water.

Biofilm on dental unit waterlines can spread microbial contamination in the water. The aim of this study was to investigate microbial contamination of water from supplies and dental units before and after the implementation of a protocol for microbial quality improvement and maintenance of dental unit water. The microbial load was evaluated in water from 27 taps and dental units (reservoirs, air-water syringes and highspeed outputs without handpieces) using the PetrifilmT system (total aerobic bacteria and fungi) and conventional culture media (enterobacteria and Legionella spp.). The bacterial load in water samples from taps and reservoirs was within the parameter established by Brazilian legislation (<500CFU/mL); but the bacterial load in samples from air-water syringes and high-speed outputs without handpieces was not. The implementation of the protocol for the maintenance of microbial quality in dental unit water reduced bacterial load in highspeed outputs without handpieces (p=0.004). Enterobacteria and Legionella spp. were not isolated from any of the water samples from taps and dental units.

Biofilme nas linhas d\'água de equipos odontológicos pode propagar contaminando microbiana na água. O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar a contaminando microbiana da água de abastecimentos e equipos odontológicos antes e após a implementando de um protocolo para melhoria e manutenndo da qualidade microbiològica da água de equipos dontológicos. Avaliou-se a carga microbiana da água de 27 torneiras e equipos (reservatórios, seringas tríplice e alta rotando sem as penas de mdo) de uma clínica odontológica por meio do sistema PetrifilmT (bacterias aeróbias totais e fungos) e meios de cultura convencionais (enterobactérias e Legionella spp.). A carga bacteriana em amostras de água das torneiras e reservatórios estava dentro do paràmetro estabelecido pela legislando brasileira (<500 UFC/mL), mas a carga bacteriana das seringas tríplices e das saídas dos alta rotando sem as penas de mdo ndo estava. A implementando do protocolo para manutenndo da qualidade da água dos equipos reduziu a carga bacteriana nas saídas dos alta rotando sem as penas de mdo (p=0,004). Enterobactérias e Legionella spp. ndo foram isoladas de qualquer das amostras de água das torneiras e dos equipos odontológicos.

Evaluation of a protocol for reducing the microbial contamination of dental unit water

Biofilm on dental unit waterlines can spread microbial contamination in the water. The aim of this study was to investigate microbial contamination of water from supplies and dental units before and after the implementation of a protocol for microbial quality improvement and maintenance of dental unit water. The microbial load was evaluated in water from 27 taps and dental units (reservoirs, airwater syringes and highspeed outputs without handpieces) using the Petrifilm™ system (total aerobic bacteria and fungi) and conventional culture media (enterobacteria and Legionella spp.). The bacterial load in water samples from taps and reservoirs was within the parameter established by Brazilian legislation (<500CFU/mL); but the bacterial load in samples from airwater syringes and highspeed outputs without handpieces was not. The imple mentation of the protocol for the maintenance of microbial quality in dental unit water reduced bacterial load in highspeed outputs without handpieces (p=0.004). Enterobacteria and Legionella spp. were not isolated from any of the water samples from taps and dental units (AU)

Biofilme nas linhas d'água de equipos odontológicos pode propagar contaminação microbiana na água. O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar a contaminação microbiana da água de abastecimentos e equipos odontológicos antes e após a implemen tação de um protocolo para melhoria e manutenção da qualidade microbiológica da água de equipos odontológicos. Avaliouse a carga microbiana da água de 27 torneiras e equipos (reservatórios, seringas tríplice e alta rotação sem as peças de mão) de uma clínica odontológica por meio do sistema Petrifilm™ (bactérias aeróbias totais e fungos) e meios de cultura convencionais (enterobactérias e Legionella spp.). A carga bacteriana em amostras de água das torneiras e reservatórios estava dentro do parâmetro estabelecido pela legislação brasileira (<500 UFC/mL), mas a carga bacte riana das seringas tríplices e das saídas dos alta rotação sem as peças de mão não estava. A implementação do protocolo para manutenção da qualidade da água dos equipos reduziu a carga bacteriana nas saídas dos alta rotação sem as peças de mão (p=0,004). Enterobactérias e Legionella spp. não foram isoladas de qualquer das amostras de água das torneiras e dos equipos odontológicos (AU)

Antiseptic mouthwashes: in vitro antibacterial activity.

Mouthwashes are used as an adjunct to tooth brushing for improving breath and preventing oral diseases. The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro Maximum Inhibitory Dilution (MID) of 3 mouthwashes with different active ingredients against mutans streptococci (MS). The products analyzed were Periogard®, Cepacol® and Plax® Fresh Mint. Their antibacterial activity was assessed in duplicate in 96-well microtiter plates against 36 clinical isolates of MS. Each mouthwash was submitted to a serial two-fold dilution (1/2.5 to 1/5120) using double concentration of Tryptose Soy Broth with 1.0% yeast extract. The final volume in each well was 100 mL plus 5 mL of a bacterial suspension, equivalent to 107 CFU/mL. They were incubated microaerobically at 37 °C for 48 hours and the MIDs determined. MID was 1/320 for Periogard® and Cepacol®, and 1/20 for PlaxR® Statistical analysis revealed that the MID of Periogard® MID did not differ from that of Cepacol® (p>0.05), and was higher than that of Plax® (p<0.05). In conclusion, the antiseptic mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine (Periogard®) and cetylpyridinium chloride (Cepacol®) had higher in vitroantibacterial activity (MID) against MS than the antiseptic mouthwash containing triclosan (Plax®), according to microbiological method employed.

Antiseptic mouthwashes: in vitro antibacterial activity / Antissépticos bucais: atividade antibacteriana

Mouthwashes are used as an adjunct to tooth brushing for improving breath and preventing oral diseases. The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro Maximum Inhibitory Dilution (MID) of 3 mouthwashes with different active ingredients against mutans streptococci (MS). The products analyzed were Periogard, Cepacol and Plax Fresh Mint. Theirantibacterial activity was assessed in duplicate in 96-well microtiter plates against 36 clinical isolates of MS. Each mouthwash was submitted to a serial two-fold dilution (1/2.5 to 1/5120) using double concentration of Tryptose Soy Broth with 1.0% yeast extract. The final volume in each well was 100mL plus 5 mL of a bacterial suspension, equivalent to 107 CFU/mL. They were incubated microaerobically at 37ºC for48 hours and the MIDs determined. MID was 1/320 forPeriogard and Cepacol, and 1/20 for Plax. Statisticalanalysis revealed that the MID of Periogard MID did not differ from that of Cepacol (p>0.05), and was higher than that of Plax (p<0.05). In conclusion, the antiseptic mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine (Periogard) and cetylpyridinium chloride (Cepacol) had higher in vitroantibacterial activity(MID) against MS than the antiseptic mouthwash containing triclosan (Plax), according to microbiological method employed.

Os antissépticos bucais são utilizados mundialmente como adjuvantes da escovação para melhoria do hálito e prevenção de doenças bucais infeciosas. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar in vitro a Diluição Inibitória Máxima (DIM) de 3 antissépticos bucais com diferentes princípios ativos contra estreptococos do grupo mutans (EGM). Os produtos analisados foram Periogard, Cepacol e Plax FreshMint. A atividade antibacteriana foi avaliada em duplicata em placasde microtilulação de 96 poços contra 36 isolados clínicos de EGM. Cada antisséptico bucal foi submetido a diluição dupla seriada (1/2,5 a 1/5120) com o emprego de concentração dupla de TryptoseSoyBrothwith adicionado de 1,0% de extrato de levedura. O volume final em cada poço foi de 100 mL mais 5mL da suspensão bacteriana equivalente a 10 UFC/mL. A incubação foi realizada em microaerofilia a 37ºC por 48 horas e a DIM deteminada. Periogard e Cepacol apresentaram DIM de 1/320, e Plax de 1/20. Os resultados submetidos asanálises estatísticas revelaram que a DIM do Periogard não foi diferente do Cepacol(p>0,05) sendo maior que do Plax (p<0,05). Em conclusão, os antissépticos bucais contendo clorexidina (Periogard) e cloreto de cetilpiridínio (Cepacol) demonstraram maior atividade antibacteriana in vitro (DIM)contra os EGM do que o antisséptico bucal contendo triclosan (Plax) de acordo com o método microbiológico utilizado.